Alongside the doctor
The intended workflow supports review without making the decision. The clinician checks, edits, and decides.
Meddies is being developed as clinical intelligence beside the doctor, designed around the hospital record and explicit clinical review rather than autonomous decisions.
Clinicians carry the responsibility of caring for too many patients, plus too many administrative steps, in a single shift. The day should not end buried in forms and duplicated notes, but that is where much of it goes.
Meddies is being designed around existing EMR workflows, with the clinical team retaining control while repetitive work is evaluated for safe support.
The intended sourced workflows keep named guidance and the review boundary visible. Important information still requires clinical verification before use.
The intended workflow supports review without making the decision. The clinician checks, edits, and decides.
Where a workflow presents a sourced clinical claim, the named guidance and review boundary should remain visible.
Clinical AI cannot be translated from Western data and then dropped into Vietnamese hospitals. Meddies localizes the AI around the data, language, workflows, and clinical work doctors in Vietnam actually use.
The data and methods our clinical AI is built on are published openly. The evidence is meant to be read, used, and checked.
Read the researchWe look for people who want to build clinical AI that a doctor can trust. If that is you, we want to talk.